Maybe there are times or intervals at which churches are no
longer able to nourish some peoples' faith.
Why say something like that?
We know that people leave church for assorted reasons. Some
leave church A to go to church B. That's not the theme of this piece. I know
people who have stopped going to a church in a building, anywhere. They are
people who have been in church for years and for whom the traditions have been
important. Yes we can talk about solidarity and church being a family and small
groups being where the growth truly happens. The people I refer to must not be
faulted, because their reasons for departure are not chiefly because the
preaching or the music or the programs have changed or because of church
politics or petty squabbles as well as escalated rows. Those factors may have
influenced their choices, but primarily they have a deep longing for more of
God or more with God.
When a person believes that Jesus is divine and places exclusive
faith in Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord, it is an experience of enlightenment
and inner peace and recognition of who God is. There is an immediate
intellectual and spiritual hunger for information and instruction in living the
life of a disciple. The outcome of this transformation is the desire to help,
to serve, and to live a productive life for God. Much of this frequently occurs
within the context of church. Most churches and their staffs devote their
energies to these stages of Christian development, bringing people to faith and
then to maturity.
That's why pastors feel hurt when people leave. That explains
why some pastors resign. Sure there are capricious, discontented, erring
churchgoers. That's part of the territory of rescuing sinners and shepherding
flocks. So there is a sense in which I say to pastors, "Get over it," followed quickly by
"Let's try to understand further."
There are also believers who have grown spiritually, taught others,
demonstrated fruit and gifts of the Spirit, who at some point say, "this is not working for me at my church. I
love my friends and my pastor, but …."
What is contained in the rest of that abbreviated sentence? That
Christian would go on to say, "I am
so hungry for something inward, richer. I desire more. I long for a deeper
relationship with God." When I was a pastor, I enjoyed the luxury of taking
off to be alone at a retreat centre, a cottage, a lodge for days at a time. I
could read, and walk, and pray, and sing, and rest, and meditate, and then do
it all over again. Not all believers can do that, but some might long for that.
But can't spiritually mature people seek that out, make that
happen even while they remain at their church? Perhaps, but maybe not. Perhaps
their spiritual aspiration is so consuming that organized church seems routine
and uninteresting. Maybe for the short term, and who knows, maybe for a
prolonged period, the church is no longer able to nourish some peoples' faith. Now, it shouldn't be that way, and it doesn't
need to be that way if the local church can overcome the weakness to which my
article points. Can pastoral staff and fellow believers understand without
becoming judgmental, that some disciples are at a stage of life with God where
solitude and reflection and opportunity to re-examine beliefs and faith are
essential, rather than expectations to usher, to teach, to cook, to sweep, to
attend functions three nights of the week. Maybe, or better yet, yes, absolutely,
I think churches should concentrate on people who have been following Jesus for
years and who are now reexamining their beliefs, and wanting to experience more
of the operations God's Spirit, and having confidence that Christ's Lordship
extends to every area of life, and enjoying the peace of God.
The comment I place here came from a friend named Phil Dufrene. Phil and his wife Debbie work with Port of Hope Ministries to encourage sailors of the world’s oceans. He boards vessels each week and spends time with these men and women.
ReplyDeleteYup. And there are a LOT of Christians who feel that god is far off and out of reach and impersonal and guilty and deep deep down are not sure God really loves them. But why are Evangelicals who have come from "formal" denominations returning to their old churches? Ask them. They love that they’ve come closer to Christ, but they miss the reverence. They miss the awe...that one must stop and pause before the Creator. Yes, people can get caught up in dull liturgy and songs that drone on. I’m talking about people with a living faith.
And don't think for a moment that the Hindu or the Sikh or the Muslim feels he's under some terrible burden, that he is yearning to break free from ritual and all that. (Yes, satan has blinded them, but when man sinned God never took away their yearning to find the supernatural...unless you're a strict Calvinist.) These religions have been around for a long time and they have satisfied people for a long time in spite of their lostness.
Please, please, talk with these people. Listen to them...really listen to them. Sense their passion for their faith, a faith they love and understand and trust, a faith that answers their questions. Listen to them say, "We would never, NEVER, treat our Holy Book as you do. We would never put it in a pile of books. It goes up here on this shelf with a white cloth under it and another on top." And don't call that ritual or mysticism. It is R-E-S-P-E-C-T for the sacred.
Yes, we can talk all we want about the freeness of the Holy Spirit in our churches. But often that can be a cover-up for show. Tell me of a church with a worship band that is all decked out and people coming up on queue where someone can simply come up and say, "God has been speaking to me...I think we need to stop and be quiet and let the Holy Spirit quietly touch us."
That's why I contend we evangelicals have come to believe that worship is great music and technical exegesis of some passage of Scripture. That's worship.
Then we walk out of church and say, “That was a great service.” And then we stop in at Tim Horton’s for lunch and go back to the way we were three hours earlier.
This post makes me think of the long tradition of the pilgrimage. It used to be an expected norm that at some stage in a devout Christians faith journey they would leave home and hearth for an extended period and go visit the holy places where the roots of our faith took place. This is not anything like today's Christian tourist industry. These would be long walking journeys dependent on the churches along they way to offer hospitality. What would it look like in the 21st century to have a built in and respected place for such people to travel on?
ReplyDeleteIt also brings to mind the early desert fathers. They left the church because they felt it had become too structured and enculturated. They were not originally held in high esteem. They were deserters, outside the accountability structures and control of the organized body. Yet over time they became highly respected spiritual explorers who we still read today.
"DO BELIEVERS OUTGROW THEIR NEED FOR CHURCH?"
ReplyDeleteThe simple answer is NO, they don't.
The longer answer is that is the wrong question. Worship is not for you; worship is for God. Collectively, we are the body of Christ. The members of that body have all been given different gifts that we may build up the body. No single person has all the gifts, they are meant for mutual edification, exhortation, and encouragement. It's not about what you get out of church yourself, it's what you give and what you become by giving and living in communion. Saying, "I no longer need church" is selfish, sinful, and short sighted. Maybe you personally do not need the church to feel fulfilled and useful to God, but maybe those "feelings" are delusional and contrary to the Word IMNTBHO.