The second commandment of the celebrated ten, forbids making
images of God or false gods that may become objects of worship.
I have a question. I won’t resolve it with this blog entry
but I will ask it and speculate about it. As an artist, I wish to know whether
that prevents me from painting an image of God if my intention is purely
aesthetic rather than devotional.
Michelangelo himself may not have worshipped that artistic
creation rather than the person of God, but it is probable that among the
thousands of daily visitors to the Vatican, there are many who have venerated
the art and artifacts housed within those walls. That is classified as
idolatry. That is what the commands warn against.
Let’s probe a bit deeper behind the prohibition of idolatry.
To make an image of God is an attempt to objectify him, perhaps even to control
God. Might it also be argued that this occurs as well when conscientious
scholars seek to “box” God within systematic theologies? Can it occur within
liturgies? Does it occur when highlighting some attribute of God or doctrine
about God within the clichéd lyrics of a song? Do we minimize, reduce, trivialize
God when we make these efforts to portray God? The point must be that we need
to understand that God is so much more than anything our finite minds can
imagine God to be.
My default position is that I can trust God to distinguish
between wicked and appropriate motives. Furthermore, God created humans with
capacity to create art of all kinds so art is not inherently evil. Therefore, I
believe that we are justified in making a distinction between the creation and
use and enjoyment of art and that it is not necessarily or the equivalent of
idolatry or worship of idols and false gods. Therefore I go so far as to say
that art used in worship and in churches is not forbidden by God but is in fact
pleasing to him and glorifies him. So much more can be said. Maybe it will be.
No comments:
Post a Comment