It’s not surprising that some Christians become disillusioned and disappointed with a church, with its leaders and with the Christian friends who comprise it. Christian education and evangelism are not the only services a church should prioritize. When a person, or couple or family experiences a crisis, the church should respond. Rapid Christian response should be the ready position. Christian friends should jump to assist. Even when the presenting issue is awkward, distressing, immoral, angry, or hopeless, it is a God-assigned responsibility to love and to listen and to counsel and to shelter and to give aid. That’s not a too-tall expectation.
People's convictions range from absolute non belief to absolute belief with lack of belief somewhere in between the two poles. Here is a straight talk forum, candid opinions, inquiries into biblical thinking about today’s everything.
Monday, May 27, 2019
RAPID CHRISTIAN RESPONSE IS NOT A TOO-TALL EXPECTATION.
Labels:
abandon,
CHRISTIANS,
Church,
expectation,
faith,
friends,
friendship,
God,
HOLY,
leaders,
rapid,
response,
transformation,
trouble
Wednesday, May 22, 2019
COUNTERING THE CLAIM THAT OBAMA WAS THE MOST ANTI-CHRISTIAN PRESIDENT
Claims that are Made to Justify the Opinion that Obama was the Most Anti Christian President.
First, this allegation is made without an comparative information about other US Presidents. Second, I have answered each of Conservative activist David Horowitz’s eight itemized accusations with some factual evidence that invalidates the majority of the claims. He himself could have ferreted out these details. Nothing is gained by these crazy claims. But Horowitz managed to sell another book with this diatribe. Dark Agenda. No one should share either liberal or conservative activist exaggerations without first examining them and validating them.
Friday, May 17, 2019
PRO-LIFER OPINIONS ABOUT SOCIAL ISSUES OTHER THAN ABORTION
An acquaintance wrote a statement recently. It prompted me to think and to respond. He wrote, “Things I'll never understand: how American "pro-life" advocates can justify the violation of the right to personal bodily integrity to prevent abortion, but cannot entertain the thought of ANY violation of the right to access firearms that would prevent the mass murder of school children.”
Immediately thereafter, he added a second statement. “If you're "pro-life" in America, you are most likely fine with forcing a 13 year old rape victim to carry to term and give birth to the perpetrator's child, but vehemently opposed to restrictions that would limit access to fully automatic military weapons that kill thousands every year.”
I enjoy thoughtful people whose minds stimulate significant discussion points.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)