WHAT IS APPROPRIATE TO SAY ABOUT A FELLOW CHRISTIAN ON THE DAY HE DIES? Some people think it is suitable to denigrate his memory on the day he dies. On the day he dies is my point. We're not speaking about a madman or a money launderer or a serial rapist. It would be entirely apt to recite his transgressions one minute after he bites it. I'm talking about an upright man whose entire life was devoted to God. What would be appropriate to say about him on the day he died? Be clear, this is not an hypothetical personality. I refer to someone whose 99 years of earth life were spent talking to God, and to people who loved God and to people who did not know God but would. What 's fitting to say about him on the day he died? If the person making the post mortem comment hates God, then anything goes. Say what you want about the deceased. But if the commenter is a child of God and a good brother has died, would the right time to point out all of the brother's alleged bad stuff be on the day he died? Why am I asking this question here?
People's convictions range from absolute non belief to absolute belief with lack of belief somewhere in between the two poles. Here is a straight talk forum, candid opinions, inquiries into biblical thinking about today’s everything.
Showing posts with label salvation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label salvation. Show all posts
Friday, February 23, 2018
Wednesday, June 8, 2016
NOBODY CAN CHOOSE NOT TO BE SAVED - IS WHAT JACQUES ELLUL SAID
I don't buy myself, but if one is to believe Jacques Ellul's interpretation of salvation, then he has news for all atheists and agnostics. They cannot reject Christ. They cannot succeed in not wanting his salvation. Here is the way he put it. I will highlight the bits that bite.
Ellul admitted that in his correlation of sociology and theology, he seemed to be a sociological pessimist while at the same time being a theological optimist. On one occasion he asks, "Am I a pessimist? Not at all. I am convinced that the history of the human race, no matter how tragic, will ultimately lead to the Kingdom of God. I am convinced that all the works of humankind will be reintegrated in the work of God, and that each of us, no matter how sinful, will ultimately be saved." This is, of course, an explicit statement of his belief in "universal salvation" or "universal reconciliation".As explanation and justification for this tenet, Ellul writes: "Salvation is universal because the love of God encompasses all. If God is God and if God is love, nothing is outside the love of God. A place like hell is thus inconceivable. The difference between the Christian and the non-Christian is not one of salvation. Salvation is given by grace to everyone. Christians are simply those charged by God with a special mission. The meaning of being a Christian is not working at your own little salvation, but changing human history." Elsewhere he states, "It is inconceivable that the God who gives Himself in His Son to save us, should have created some people ordained to evil and damnation. There can only be one predestination to salvation. In and through Jesus Christ all people are predestined to be saved. Our free choice is ruled out in this regard. God wants free people, except in relation to this last and definitive decision. We are not free to decide and choose to be damned." "Being saved or lost does not depend on our own free decision. An explicit confession of Jesus Christ is not the condition for salvation. Salvation is always for everyone, by grace. All people are included in the grace of God. A theology of grace implies universal salvation."from an article entitled, A Synopsis and Analysis of the Thought and Writings of Jacques Ellul by James A. Fowler http://www.christinyou.com/pages/ellul.html
Labels:
Christ,
Free,
Jacques Ellul,
lost,
predestination,
reconciliation,
salvation,
saved
Friday, August 22, 2014
GLORY IS THE GOAL
![]() |
| Defeat of Rebel Angels by Pieter Breugal Sr |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

